![]() ![]() ![]() She is clearly as concerned with the political and the historical contexts and intentions of the text and author as she is with usually more narrowly defined cultural or literary issues. The questions of for whom one writes and to what end underlie Harlow’s own work as she points to the very similar questions that pervade the work of the writers and texts discussed in her study. Harlow’s opening chapter, “The Theoretical-Historical Context,” suggests what is perhaps the most crucial of her working assumptions - that “the theory of resistance literature is in its politics” (p. Harlow’s citation for the term “literature of resistance” is Ghassan Kanafani’s 1966 study, Literature of Resistance in Occupied Palestine: 1948-1966. It is the literature of resistance to colonialism and its successors. ![]() Harlow considers the specifics of a wide national and linguistic range of texts/contexts within what are usually considered generic literary categories - poetry (Chapter 2), narrative (Chapter 3), and autobiography (Chapter 4: “Prison Memoirs of Political Detainees”). In the final chapter, “Commitment to the Future: Utopia, Dystopia, and Post-Independence Developments,” generic divisions give way to a consideration of literary texts that attempt to formulate possible futures in which literary and political categories as we know them now are radically transformed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |